Through reading my peers’ feedback, I know I need to make more opinions or make them more known. I also need to make stronger connections to the metagenres and talk more about them. Both Alicia and Emma comment on my explanations being strong. Alicia also commented that I should give more examples of the course requirements and explain them to help the reader better understand the major. Meg commented on some of the strong points she saw in my paper, which helped me to identify what topics did not need as much revision or to build a stronger portion of the next topic. I was having difficulty writing about the metagenres because I really don’t understand why a major needs to fit into just one, but I have trouble justifying all even though I do think the EDU major does fit into all four. I will be adding my interview with Audrey, the EDU department head, as well as the above mentioned. I will try harder to affirm my mentions of the metagenres and make that section of my paper stronger. Both writings can be a little difficult to work with since the author is simply explaining their own concepts with no outside sources. This paper is a little easier to argue than the last one, but I do not find myself engaging in too much argument yet.
